Thursday, May 31, 2007

Big Disparities in Judging of Asylum Cases

The New York Times has this report discussing some of the major problems affecting the adjudication of asylum cases in the United States. The report explains that “Asylum seekers in the United States face broad disparities in the nation’s 54 immigration courts, with the outcome of cases influenced by things like the location of the court and the sex and professional background of judges.”

Sound Off
Operation Eroding Freedom
John W. Whitehead's Commentary
First Liberties
OldSpeak

About This Page
America faces many daunting and divisive social, political, and moral issues whose outcomes will define us as a nation. Throughout America’s history, the judicial branch has played a significant role in resolving monumental issues as they shape our law, attitudes and values. In fact, the judiciary—especially the U.S. Supreme Court—often has the final word on weighty issues like abortion, religious freedom, free speech and privacy rights. Court Watch enables readers to track cases and issues as they make their way through the courts, as well as monitor the impact of judicial rulings on our constitutional freedoms.

Archive

November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007