![]() |
|||
| Monday, November 29, 2004 Jason Adkins Mr. Whitehead, Thank you for taking a stand and helping TSgt Jason Adkins. Just a little under a year ago, I was having many of the same problems after my third shot (ER visits, high blood pressure, migranes, shaking, numbness, greyouts, chest pains to name a few). Shortly thereafter, Tulane found my blood serum to contain antibodies to squalene. Clearly, something is definitely going on. I know of another Captain on my base who came down with myocarditus (resolved now) after the same "batch" we took within days of eachother. It only takes one vial to be mixed in with the others. It's random, but surely monitored for the effects. "No news is good news" to the Army when it comes to squalene tests. But when you give the Vaccine Health Center your test results for being positive to antibodies, they "suddenly" have a decision--take more vaccine. Huh? Finally, someone takes a stand in the legal system! Next to Mark Zaid with the recent six, I couldn't be happier. My sincere thanks and prayers go to you for this worthy case of Safety & First Ammendment Rights, ROBERT C. BEPKO, Capt, USAF Lackland AFB, TX Tuesday, November 23, 2004 Thanksgiving Heritage Sandra Francisco Thursday, November 18, 2004 Kinsey and Rockefeller Dear Mr. Whitehead: I am new to your newsletter, and quite proudly a Traditional Roman Catholic. This was my birthright, and I thank God and Our Lady constantly for it. And I believe very strongly in Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi. That explains a lot of what we see today, I fear. I was alive and well when this Kinsey thing hit the fan, and as suddenly as a squall ruins a perfectly sunny day, the brightness of life as we saw it after the war had finally ended became tainted with the unveiling of a formerly taboo subject among polite company. The word, 'sex' had arisen out of the shadows, and it soon demanded its place on top of the list of chat and gossip whether in school hallways, office restrooms or social gatherings. To those of us raised with the longstanding traditional religious and family values that went back for centuries, this was a shock, and it left its ugly mark. These were the times when young couples should have been fulfilling their natural desires to get married and have a family - and grow together, as patiently as it takes a magnificent tree to rise from the little acorn until their natural life cycles would end in death, and their young hopefully would carry on in their traditions and the wonderful memories of normal family stress and struggles during illnesses, financial worries, and the like. Not so. Very soon this invisible plague became a forest fire, raging where it would, and we heard of the first 'divorce' - a word in the dictionary before, but now a disgrace we were forced to deal with more and more. My bottom line here, Mr. Whitehead, is that Kinsey was an agent of Satan, and his being funded by the likes of the Rockefeller Foundation was a natural alliance, since the ultimate goal was to destroy Christ and His Church. We can see that ever so plainly now! But you know that.... what I wish to add here is something you may not know of, but it must be factored into what you have exposed, for it had a beginning, and it was from Hell..... One of the messages Our Lady of Fatima gave to her remaining seer, Sr. Lucy, was that the Devil was in the mood to engage in a decisive battle with the Virgin - and this troubled the nun mightily. A decisive battle could only mean a severe battle in which only one would be victorious, and the consequences severe. We know from Genesis that 'the Woman' would conquer - but a lot was riding on Her messages to the children, perhaps the most dire one being that if the Holy Father did not obey Heaven's Commands (to release the final part of the 'Secret', and to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary together with all the bishops, exactly as Heaven laid out), "a Diabolical Disorientation" would overtake the entire world. This frightened Sr. Lucy so that she wrote her three priest-nephews about her concerns - but by this time (late 50's) she had just been silenced by Rome, so she could reveal no more of Fatima to the waiting world. What do these two words mean? You can understand them, and so can I; but if we were actually victims of this Heavenly Curse, could we then? I think not. In point of fact, Mr. Whitehead, I only recently was awakened to the true meaning behind what I have shortened to "D2": the interference of the Demonic hordes which could - and would - change the way we saw, heard and interpreted things, for we would be so confused and disoriented that new ideas could be introduced to us and we would not discern right from wrong anymore! Tell me - does this not fit into what has driven you to do the work you are struggling to achieve in God's Name? In case you are wondering why this dramatic fact has not been waved at the world from the highest levels in the Church, that's a question you shall have to deal with in your soul. It fits perfectly into the suppression of the Holy Virgin's entire mission at Fatima, and the resultant chaos you see in your church, for you cannot NOT see! It was in the third volume of Frere Michel's magnificent work entitled, "The Whole Truth About Fatima", which Fr. Gruner published and mailed out in the 1980's after it was translated from the original French. When I read those words, I guess by the grace of God I was unable to erase them from my mind - but whenever I spoke of them to whomever, there was that same blank, blinky look which I could never until now understand. Try it in your circles - Catholic or no - and see what result you get. So far I have spoken to six priests, none of whom knew what I was talking about. So you see, Mr. Whitehead, we have a huge problem here, and in my mind it must be attacked with nothing less than an International Rosary Crusade for just such purpose. People run to doctors when they think they are ill - why should we not run to the best source of relief we know: Heaven. Every day I see and hear news items which seem incredible - they should be indeed, but not under D2. And they will get worse, until something is done. Can you help? Respectfully, J J Ehret Banning, CA |
Archive June 2004July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010
|
||
| The Rutherford Institute P.O. Box
7482 Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482 Phone :: 434.978.3888 (8:30 AM - 5:00 PM Eastern) | Fax :: 434.978.1789 General Inquiries:: staff@rutherford.org | Legal Assistance:: tristaff@rutherford.org Technical comments :: webmaster@rutherford.org ©2007 The Rutherford Institute | Privacy Info |
|||