John Whitehead's Commentary
Sounding the Call for Freedom: Aung San Suu Kyi
"The struggle for democracy and human rights in Burma is a struggle for life and dignity. It is a struggle that encompasses our political, social and economic aspirations."
"There is nothing to compare with the courage of ordinary people whose names are unknown and whose sacrifices pass unnoticed. The courage that dares without recognition, without the protection of media attention, is a courage that humbles and inspires and reaffirms our faith in humanity."--Aung San Suu Kyi
As those who fought to establish America's freedoms knew very well, it often requires great sacrifice. The quest for freedom takes on many forms and many voices. For some, it is a striving to speak freely. For others, it is an attempt to live their lives free of government interference. For still others, it is an effort to raise their children free from the terrors of warfare and persecution.
For the people of Burma--renamed Myanmar by the military junta that controls the country--their quest touches on all aspects of this struggle. It is embodied in the life and work of a solitary courageous woman--Aung San Suu Kyi, a 58-year-old opposition fighter who has spent close to a decade under house arrest.
Suu Kyi's love of her people and the land date back to a time when her father, General Aung San, led Burma out from under British colonialism to self-rule. After Aung San's assassination by political rivals, the country quickly fell under control of the military. Despite popular elections for civilian rule, the military has maintained its stronghold on the Burmese people to such an extent that when Suu Kyi assumed leadership of the National League for Democracy (NLD), the military government, fearing her popularity, placed her under house arrest at her lakeside villa in Rangoon.
Since that first confinement on July 20, 1989, which lasted for six years, Suu Kyi has been detained on two other occasions. The most recent arrest occurred in late May 2003, when junta forces took Sun Kyi into "protective custody" after skirmishes broke out between her supporters and a pro-junta group. Although various heads of state, including Secretary of State Colin Powell, have demanded her release, the woman referred to as Burma's hope for freedom remains a prisoner.
I first learned of Aung San Suu Kyi earlier this year when she was awarded the Al Neuharth Free Spirit of the Year Award for her nonviolent efforts on behalf of the oppressed people of Burma. Unwilling to leave Burma for fear that she would not be allowed to return, Suu Kyi relayed her acceptance speech via a pre-taped message. Despite her absence, the event was in sharp contrast to another award ceremony that took place 12 years earlier, when Suu Kyi's husband and sons accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf because she was still under house arrest in Rangoon. As the Nobel presenter aptly put it, "In the good fight for peace and reconciliation, we are dependent on persons who set examples, persons who can symbolise what we are seeking and mobilise the best in us. Aung San Suu Kyi is just such a person."
As I think about the sacrifices Suu Kyi has made in the hope of someday securing freedom for the Burmese people, I wonder how far most Americans, complacent in their materialistic lifestyles, would be willing to go--how much they would be willing to sacrifice--to safeguard their basic rights of association, assembly and expression. When Aung San Suu Kyi was last released from confinement, she was given a choice: walk away from Burma after years of confinement, reunite with her family and enjoy her freedom or stay and fight for democracy. She chose to stay and fight.
In a letter written in 1996, after her first release from confinement, Suu Kyi asked,
How many can be said to be leading normal lives in a country where there are such deep divisions of heart and mind, where there is neither freedom nor security? When we ask for democracy, all we are asking is that our people should be allowed to live in tranquility under the rule of law, protected by institutions which will guarantee our rights, the rights that will enable us to maintain our human dignity, to heal long festering wounds and to allow love and courage to flourish. Is that such a very unreasonable demand?
Faced with an attorney general who is demanding greater powers over the American people with every passing day, faced with a Congress that signs invasive legislation into being and asks questions afterwards, faced with a government that is slipping inexorably closer to being a police state, we might ask the very same thing. How can Americans lead such seemingly normal lives when all around us the walls seem to be closing in?
As Suu Kyi's son remarked in his Nobel acceptance speech on her behalf, "The lonely struggle taking place in a heavily guarded compound in Rangoon is part of the much larger struggle, worldwide, for the emancipation of the human spirit from political tyranny and psychological subjection."
As the world continues to wait and watch for the next installment in this courageous woman's quest to ensure freedom for her people, let us not forget that Suu Kyi's struggle for freedom should be our struggle as well. In a 1995 interview with Time magazine, Suu Kyi remarked, "[P]eople who expect too much do too little. If they want something, they have got to work for it, and there is a lot of work to do."
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org.
"There is nothing to compare with the courage of ordinary people whose names are unknown and whose sacrifices pass unnoticed. The courage that dares without recognition, without the protection of media attention, is a courage that humbles and inspires and reaffirms our faith in humanity."--Aung San Suu Kyi
As those who fought to establish America's freedoms knew very well, it often requires great sacrifice. The quest for freedom takes on many forms and many voices. For some, it is a striving to speak freely. For others, it is an attempt to live their lives free of government interference. For still others, it is an effort to raise their children free from the terrors of warfare and persecution.
For the people of Burma--renamed Myanmar by the military junta that controls the country--their quest touches on all aspects of this struggle. It is embodied in the life and work of a solitary courageous woman--Aung San Suu Kyi, a 58-year-old opposition fighter who has spent close to a decade under house arrest.
Suu Kyi's love of her people and the land date back to a time when her father, General Aung San, led Burma out from under British colonialism to self-rule. After Aung San's assassination by political rivals, the country quickly fell under control of the military. Despite popular elections for civilian rule, the military has maintained its stronghold on the Burmese people to such an extent that when Suu Kyi assumed leadership of the National League for Democracy (NLD), the military government, fearing her popularity, placed her under house arrest at her lakeside villa in Rangoon.
Since that first confinement on July 20, 1989, which lasted for six years, Suu Kyi has been detained on two other occasions. The most recent arrest occurred in late May 2003, when junta forces took Sun Kyi into "protective custody" after skirmishes broke out between her supporters and a pro-junta group. Although various heads of state, including Secretary of State Colin Powell, have demanded her release, the woman referred to as Burma's hope for freedom remains a prisoner.
I first learned of Aung San Suu Kyi earlier this year when she was awarded the Al Neuharth Free Spirit of the Year Award for her nonviolent efforts on behalf of the oppressed people of Burma. Unwilling to leave Burma for fear that she would not be allowed to return, Suu Kyi relayed her acceptance speech via a pre-taped message. Despite her absence, the event was in sharp contrast to another award ceremony that took place 12 years earlier, when Suu Kyi's husband and sons accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf because she was still under house arrest in Rangoon. As the Nobel presenter aptly put it, "In the good fight for peace and reconciliation, we are dependent on persons who set examples, persons who can symbolise what we are seeking and mobilise the best in us. Aung San Suu Kyi is just such a person."
As I think about the sacrifices Suu Kyi has made in the hope of someday securing freedom for the Burmese people, I wonder how far most Americans, complacent in their materialistic lifestyles, would be willing to go--how much they would be willing to sacrifice--to safeguard their basic rights of association, assembly and expression. When Aung San Suu Kyi was last released from confinement, she was given a choice: walk away from Burma after years of confinement, reunite with her family and enjoy her freedom or stay and fight for democracy. She chose to stay and fight.
In a letter written in 1996, after her first release from confinement, Suu Kyi asked,
How many can be said to be leading normal lives in a country where there are such deep divisions of heart and mind, where there is neither freedom nor security? When we ask for democracy, all we are asking is that our people should be allowed to live in tranquility under the rule of law, protected by institutions which will guarantee our rights, the rights that will enable us to maintain our human dignity, to heal long festering wounds and to allow love and courage to flourish. Is that such a very unreasonable demand?
Faced with an attorney general who is demanding greater powers over the American people with every passing day, faced with a Congress that signs invasive legislation into being and asks questions afterwards, faced with a government that is slipping inexorably closer to being a police state, we might ask the very same thing. How can Americans lead such seemingly normal lives when all around us the walls seem to be closing in?
As Suu Kyi's son remarked in his Nobel acceptance speech on her behalf, "The lonely struggle taking place in a heavily guarded compound in Rangoon is part of the much larger struggle, worldwide, for the emancipation of the human spirit from political tyranny and psychological subjection."
As the world continues to wait and watch for the next installment in this courageous woman's quest to ensure freedom for her people, let us not forget that Suu Kyi's struggle for freedom should be our struggle as well. In a 1995 interview with Time magazine, Suu Kyi remarked, "[P]eople who expect too much do too little. If they want something, they have got to work for it, and there is a lot of work to do."
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org.
ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His most recent books are the best-selling Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the award-winning A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, and a debut dystopian fiction novel, The Erik Blair Diaries. Whitehead can be contacted at staff@rutherford.org. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
Publication Guidelines / Reprint Permission
John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers and web publications at no charge. Please contact staff@rutherford.org to obtain reprint permission.
